Supreme Court Pulls Up States on Menstrual Hygiene Implementation

Why in news?

The Supreme Court expressed dissatisfaction with states and Union Territories for not responding to the Centre regarding the implementation of its judgment on menstrual hygiene as a fundamental right under Article 21.

Key points

1. 1The apex court declared menstrual hygiene as part of the fundamental right to life and personal liberty (Article 21).
2. 2States and UTs were directed to report on the implementation of the judgment.
3. 3Most states and UTs have failed to respond to the Centre's queries.
4. 4The court questioned how the fundamental right would be given effect if it remains only on paper.

Background & context

Article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. The Supreme Court has, over time, expanded its interpretation to include various aspects of dignity and well-being, such as the right to health, clean environment, and now, menstrual health and hygiene.