Polity/Environment· 1 min read
Supreme Court's stance on Preservation of Culture as a Fundamental Right
Why in news?
The Supreme Court acknowledged that the preservation of culture is a constitutionally protected fundamental right, while hearing a case challenging the Great Nicobar Island Project.
Key points
- The Supreme Court emphasized that tribal cultures require constitutional protection.
- The court refused to stay Calcutta High Court proceedings in a petition challenging the Great Nicobar Island Project.
- The project is significant for national importance and strategic value, according to the Union government.
- The court urged the Calcutta High Court to decide the case without delay.
Background & context
The Great Nicobar Island is home to indigenous tribal populations, including the Shompen tribe. Environmental and cultural impact assessments are crucial for large development projects in ecologically sensitive areas.
★ Prelims fact capsule
The Supreme Court's observation highlights the constitutional status of cultural preservation.
✎ Mains relevance
GS-I: Society (Culture, Indigenous rights), GS-II: Polity (Fundamental Rights), GS-III: Environment (Environmental Impact Assessment).